Fix Fortran interface for FillPatch for face variables #3541
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The stride was wrong when copying MultiFab pointers from a Fortran array to a Vector of Array of MultiFab pointers. This also fixes cases when the user passes t_new followed by t_old, instead of the other order. The issue was then teps was negative. This was a minor issue, because the FillPatch function in C++ does not care about the order.
kngott
approved these changes
Sep 14, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
The stride was wrong when copying MultiFab pointers from a Fortran array to a Vector of Array of MultiFab pointers.
This also fixes cases when the user passes t_new followed by t_old, instead of the other order. The issue was then teps was negative. This was a minor issue, because the FillPatch function in C++ does not care about the order.
Additional background
#327 (comment)
Checklist
The proposed changes: